What To Expect From The Second Public Jan. 6 Committee Hearing
The House select committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol will keep up a second public hearing at 10 a.m. ET Monday as it continues to present its findings related to former President Donald Trump’s role in the violence that day.
The first hearing aired for two hours on chief-time television on Thursday and drew 20 million viewers. All broadcast and cable news networks except Fox News carried the hearing live.
The committee has six public hearings planned in total, and at the minimum one more will be during chief time.
During the first hearing, the committee released never-before-seen video of the violence and showed testimony from former Attorney General William Barr and Ivanka Trump, Trump’s daughter and former White House adviser.
Trump responded to the first hearing with a barrage of messages on his Truth Social app, his main method of communicating with supporters since he was banned from Twitter for spreading election falsehoods.
You can catch up here on the big moments you might have missed from the first hearing. Here’s what to expect from the next round:
The focus of the hearing will be that Trump and his allies knew he lost but pushed election fraud lies anyway
Jamie Raskin on CNN says he thinks the January 6 committee can prove that Trump knew he lost the 2020 election while he was lying about it and trying to overturn the consequence pic.twitter.com/eeZG1q7r8n
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) June 12, 2022
Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), the committee’s vice chair, said last week that the second hearing will show that Trump and his advisers knew he lost the election to President Joe Biden, but that, despite this, Trump “engaged in a enormous effort to spread false and fraudulent information to convince huge portions of the U.S. population that fraud had stolen the election from him.”
Barr’s testimony aired Thursday already touched on this point. Barr said he told Trump his claims around election fraud were “bullshit” and that he did not agree with the idea of saying the election was stolen.
We can expect more testimony and findings from people in Trump’s orbit saying they told him he had lost the election and there was no evidence to sustain Trump’s allegations.
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) said Sunday that the committee could “prove to any reasonable, open-minded person that Donald Trump absolutely knew” he lost.
“Any reasonable person in America will tell you, he had to have known he was spreading a big lie, and he continues to spread it to this very day,” Raskin told CNN.
Conservative Republican election attorney Ben Ginsberg will reportedly testify there was no evidence of extensive fraud
In this June 23, 2012, file photo, campaign counsel Ben Ginsberg walks at a private donors’ conference for Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney at The Chateaux at Silver Lake at Deer Valley Resort in Park City, Utah.
AP Photo/Charles Dharapak, File
Ben Ginsberg, a Republican attorney who is considered an expert on elections, will testify there was no evidence of extensive fraud in the 2020 election, according to CNN. He will also testify on the many failed legal challenges by Trump’s team.
CNN cited supplies on Ginsberg’s testimony, as the committee investigating Jan. 6 hasn’t publicly released the names of those testifying.
Ginsberg played a crucial role in the 2000 presidential recount and defeat of Al Gore to George W. Bush.
He also criticized Trump in a November 2020 opinion piece in The Washington Post, saying Trump had launched an “all-out, multimillion-dollar effort to disenfranchise voters.”
It will include testimony from Chris Stirewalt, a fired Fox News editor who called Arizona for Biden
Chris Stirewalt, a former Fox News political editor, is set to testify Monday.
While Stirewalt said he couldn’t discuss exactly what his testimony will be, it should be related to the committee’s theme of what Trump and his team knew versus how they acted.
Stirewalt was fired from the network in January 2021 after receiving right-wing backlash to his decision to call Arizona for Biden on election night 2020, which reportedly infuriated Trump.
Stirewalt defended his decision in an editorial in the Los Angeles Times in January 2021 and criticized American media. “Having been cosseted by self-validating coverage for so long, many Americans now consider any news that might suggest that they are in error or that their side has been defeated as an attack on them personally,” he wrote.
While the first hearing provided an overview, we will get more details in the second and later hearings
Kinzinger on January 6: “I think it is very obvious that the president didn’t do anything but gleefully watch television when this was going down.” pic.twitter.com/LtlodkYq2m
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) June 12, 2022
Committee member Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) on Sunday touched on the amount of misinformation that flooded the zone around the time of the Jan. 6 attack and continues to be pervasive.
Kinzinger said Thursday’s hearing was meant to be a top-line look at what happened. He also responded to Trump’s claim that the president tried to reach out to the National Guard during the violence after testimony showed then-Vice President Mike Pence had to jump in when the president wouldn’t.
“I think it’s very obvious that the president didn’t do anything but gleefully watch television when this was going down,” Kinzinger told CBS’s “confront the Nation.”
Click: See details