What Is A What-If examination?
A What-if examination is a brainstorming activity that can be used to determine things that can go wrong in center scenarios. After calculating what could negatively happen, the consequences are then judged thereafter. A What-if examination can be used for any kind of possible disaster. For the sake of this article, we will discuss how this examination can be applied to a fire safety plan.
Based off of the answers that are obtained from what-if styled questions, informed judgments can then be made concerning the risks associated with moving forward with a particular activity. Any risks that have been deemed permissible can have a course of action outlined about ways to avoid the possible disaster from occurring. When it comes to fire safety, it is vital to remember that prevention is meaningful.
Steps To Conducting A What-If examination
When conducting a what-if examination, the first thing that needs to take place is a leader must be chosen. Once a leader is chosen, they will then be responsible for walking their team by the steps of the examination. The leader should utilize detailed diagrams and operating guidelines that the rest of the team can keep with them. Guidelines that determine what the permissible safety levels are is important to hand out also.
Once the leader is stated, it is time to get down to business. The team should then begin generating various what-if questions for the subject at hand, in this case, fire safety. When developing what-if questions, that will then need to be tested to determine if they are realistic or not, there are a few things to consider.
· Human error- Human error is the first thing to think about what conducting a what-if examination. Many hazardous situations occur from a simple human mistake. Make some of your questions centered on this point.
· Equipment failure- Equipment failure is another reason that a fire could break out. Consider the different types of equipment that is used in your facility when conducting a what-if examination.
· Deviations from expected parameters- Any deviation from a basic parameter can make the difference between a fire starting and its prevention.
estimate And estimate All possible Risks
Once all what-if questions have been generated by the team, the next step is to review them. The team needs to gather all of the questions and determine if there are any likely error supplies. They should then decide at this point, what the probability of each error occurring is. After the probability has been determined, then the consequences need to be accessed also. The consequences of something hazardous happening, make it extremely important to perform one of these analyses.
Develop Solutions and Recommendations
Different steps need to be taken if a risk is deemed to be permissible or unacceptable. While conducting your examination, if the risk is considered to be unacceptable by the team, then there will need to be a corrective action performed. At this point all recommendations are recorded.
If the risk is deemed to be permissible, but the probability is low and the consequences are not anything life threatening, the team may choose to mark this scenario as a no recommendation response. Remember that time is valuable when it comes to a hazardous situation, such as a fire. consequently, if the steps to correct the problem will include a lot of time and costs, this is usually deemed as an unacceptable method to rectify the issue.
Summarize and Prioritize The What-if examination
After developing recommendations for the what-if questions that are deemed permissible, the next step is to summarize and prioritize the information that has been gathered. The summary needs to be prioritized based on the probability of the what-if examination truly occurring. For example, a fire starting because of an oven exploding would be prioritized above a fire starting because of a piece of paper being lit on fire by a lighter. The oven blaze would spread quicker… causing a bigger danger then the other scenario.
Assign A Call To Action
Assigning a call to action is the final step in conducting a what-if examination. At this point, all probable scenarios should have a solution to them if they were occur. To assign a call of action to help prevent these issues from occurring, you may want to consider adding an additional column to your current what-if examination that you have put together. Indicate a person or a group of people that are going to be stated to ensure that corrective actions are taken so a fire danger does not occur.
The Benefits of Using A What-If examination
Protecting the building that you function and the people who reside in it is important. What-if analyses allow you to look at things from another perspective and take the appropriate steps to safeguard your facility if an negative event were to occur. This kind of examination is easy to use, and there are no specialized tools required to do so.
To include in creating a what-if examination, you do not have to have experience with doing danger analyses. This makes this form of analyzing attractive. Anyone can be involved in a team performing this kind of examination and understand how to be insightful. Doing one of these types of analyses makes people think outside the box and consider various scenarios that could occur, however, we hardly consider until they do happen.
Are There Limitations To The What-If examination?
Any form of examination has its limitations. This kind of form of analyzing hazards is only useful when the right types of questions are asked. The success of creating an impactful what-if examination is going to rely solely on the input of the team members that are involved in the task. That is why it is important to set down with a team of complex individuals to develop this kind of list.